hello friends! new(ish)!
Talk:DNS: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
>Galactus No edit summary |
>Galactus mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
:No, but for anons living in censored countries it's still a step up. As much as I distrust google, they did enable revolutions via their dns. | :No, but for anons living in censored countries it's still a step up. As much as I distrust google, they did enable revolutions via their dns. | ||
Privacy conscious anons are probably vpnning or torring anyway, which automates alternative dns selection. | :Privacy conscious anons are probably vpnning or torring anyway, which automates alternative dns selection. | ||
How about we add a sentence/warning/something to note that google isn't to be fully trusted, rather than exclude them completely? [[User:Mrsnooze|Mrsnooze]] ([[User talk:Mrsnooze|talk]]) 01:10, 5 March 2016 (EST) | :How about we add a sentence/warning/something to note that google isn't to be fully trusted, rather than exclude them completely? [[User:Mrsnooze|Mrsnooze]] ([[User talk:Mrsnooze|talk]]) 01:10, 5 March 2016 (EST) | ||
::Why though? OpenNIC has hundreds of servers and actually [https://api.opennicproject.org/geoip/ automates the selection process] for the less technologically inclined, with the added plus that they don't keep logs, don't sell your information, and so on, so forth. Some of them even support [[DNSCrypt]] by default. [[User:Galactus|— Galactus]] ([[User talk:Galactus|talk]]) 01:15, 5 March 2016 (EST) | ::Why though? OpenNIC has hundreds of servers and actually [https://api.opennicproject.org/geoip/ automates the selection process] for the less technologically inclined, with the added plus that they don't keep logs, don't sell your information, and so on, so forth. Some of them even support [[DNSCrypt]] by default. [[User:Galactus|— Galactus]] ([[User talk:Galactus|talk]]) 01:15, 5 March 2016 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 06:15, 5 March 2016
Is this article even needed when we already have Anonymising Yourself and DNSCrypt? It's terribly worded and an absolute mess. It would be quicker to write it from scratch at this point, or outright mix-and-match those two articles.
-- Galactus (talk) 07:24, 6 December 2015 (EST)
- I've made a redirect page for DNS page to Anonymising Yourself#DNS. --Morpheus (talk) 09:51, 6 December 2015 (EST)
Google DNS
Do you genuinely believe privacy conscious users should use google's DNS?
— Galactus (talk) 01:03, 5 March 2016 (EST)
- No, but for anons living in censored countries it's still a step up. As much as I distrust google, they did enable revolutions via their dns.
- Privacy conscious anons are probably vpnning or torring anyway, which automates alternative dns selection.
- How about we add a sentence/warning/something to note that google isn't to be fully trusted, rather than exclude them completely? Mrsnooze (talk) 01:10, 5 March 2016 (EST)
- Why though? OpenNIC has hundreds of servers and actually automates the selection process for the less technologically inclined, with the added plus that they don't keep logs, don't sell your information, and so on, so forth. Some of them even support DNSCrypt by default. — Galactus (talk) 01:15, 5 March 2016 (EST)