hello friends! new(ish)!
Talk:Radeon: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
>Galactus (→AMDGPU) |
>Keboler No edit summary |
||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
:::The AMDGPU PRO driver! [[User:Galactus|— Galactus]] ([[User talk:Galactus|talk]]) 21:27, 5 October 2016 (EDT) | :::The AMDGPU PRO driver! [[User:Galactus|— Galactus]] ([[User talk:Galactus|talk]]) 21:27, 5 October 2016 (EDT) | ||
::::Compared to the free xf86-video-amdgpu, AMDGOY PRO makes absolutely zero difference performance wise, and only has Vulkan support to offer. [[User:Keboler|Keboler]] ([[User talk:Keboler|talk]]) 11:16, 6 October 2016 (EDT) |
Revision as of 15:16, 6 October 2016
Shouldn't the Requirements and dependencies be distro-neutral/covering most major distros? The packaging looks like Gentoo. --Morpheus (talk) 07:45, 9 December 2015 (EST)
- I got the dependency graph using gentoo's equery depgraph function, but they're still distro neutral.
to do
- Separate main article from guide
- Add more info to main article
— Galactus (talk) 11:29, 5 April 2016 (EDT)
Rename article
From Radeon to Radeon (driver).
— Galactus (talk) 18:39, 5 April 2016 (EDT)
AMDGPU
Does AMDGPU deserve it's own article? I think it needs a mention at least, being the fastest free-as-in-freedom Xorg video driver and probably a solution to many issues with the Radeon driver. Keboler (talk) 16:22, 4 October 2016 (EDT)
- Technically the userspace code is not free, but sure. Then we can create an umbrella article with all the drivers. — Galactus (talk) 12:15, 5 October 2016 (EDT)
- The AMDGPU PRO driver! — Galactus (talk) 21:27, 5 October 2016 (EDT)