hello friends! new(ish)!
User talk:NSA Hater: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
>Richard M. Stallman No edit summary |
>Richard M. Stallman No edit summary |
||
| Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
::::::::::::::::::>>>>using invalid argument -- seriously, heartbleed? | ::::::::::::::::::>>>>using invalid argument -- seriously, heartbleed? | ||
::::::::::::::::::::::::>calling argument invalid | |||
:::::::::::::::::::::::: | ::::::::::::::::::::::::>not providing reason | ||
wow very logic amaze :) | wow very logic amaze :) | ||
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>implying Linus has anything to do with SE Linux | :>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>implying Linus has anything to do with SE Linux | ||
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>implying Linus is part of RedHat | :>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>implying Linus is part of RedHat | ||
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>implying systemd is not overly complex | :>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>implying systemd is not overly complex | ||
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>systemd uses more than 100mb system memory to accomplish what runit does in a few mbs | :>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>systemd uses more than 100mb system memory to accomplish what runit does in a few mbs | ||
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>implying anyone can reject NSA's code | :>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>implying anyone can reject NSA's code | ||
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>implying anyone actually checks code submitted by redhat | :>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>implying anyone actually checks code submitted by redhat | ||
Revision as of 18:15, 4 December 2015
Get a fucking life. Stop vandalizing --The NSA (talk) 12:43, 4 December 2015 (EST)
- Make me.
- Oh wow, such insult, very offense, much serious, scare, so serious, wow, amaze, vandal.
- I think it is safe to say that this is one of those underage shitposters who frequently shitposts on /tech/ and annoys the hell out of everyone. It makes sense that he'd be one because today there is no school for a lot of students. If this is the case he should also be banned from 4chan because their age limit is 18+.--The One, The Only... Chocolate Chip! (talk) 12:54, 4 December 2015 (EST)
- Oh wow, such insult, very offense, much serious, scare, so serious, wow, amaze, vandal.
- such insult much offense.
>/tech/ not /g/ 8ch pleb
>ban this is 4chan, goy, the concept of ban is meaningless.
>should kekked
Gtfo you fookin furry brony cancer, go back to Reddit you cuck.
>>>/r/fsf --The NSA (talk) 12:58, 4 December 2015 (EST)
- >recommending reddit
- >>>/trash/
- >a piece of shit like you
- nice opinion right there
- >4chan is non-free
- Sure it isn't. Just remove Ubuntu from your edits and I'll stop tbh fam.
- Amazon tbh smh fam.
- >implying the NSA-developed SELinux is affected by backdoors
- implying you can't see the source of SELinux --13:09, 4 December 2015 (EST)
- implying anyone not from the NSA can actually change anything
- implying the software is not made to be overly complex so that no one can look into it
- >>>>what is heartbleed
- implying the change cannot be tracked by linus
- implying the source CAN be made overly complex without rejection from LKML
- >>>>using invalid argument -- seriously, heartbleed?
- >calling argument invalid
- >not providing reason
wow very logic amaze :)
- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>implying Linus has anything to do with SE Linux
- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>implying Linus is part of RedHat
- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>implying systemd is not overly complex
- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>systemd uses more than 100mb system memory to accomplish what runit does in a few mbs
- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>implying anyone can reject NSA's code
- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>implying anyone actually checks code submitted by redhat