User:Se7en

I'm just a guy that keeps on keeping on. I decided that since I'm not doing much else, I'd make this user page actually presentable and an accurate representation of me. It's a work in Progress.

Things I am against

File:Concent to hugs.jpg

I am mostly against Political Correct nonsense, such as this

Political correctness and SJWs

File:Rape-to-an-sjw.png

This is what an SJW thinks of rape

"Political Correctness is a harsher and more controlling form of totalitarianism."

-- Slavoj Žižek for a video from Big Think

The SJW Plague is a primary example of how not to protest. Through their own stupidity, and confusion, the SJW exerts their own idea of what is right to make themselves look better as a person. This not only hurts feminist movements, but it makes a burden on the community. Through false claims of rape justified by definitions of the meaning (see photo), law enforcement are forced to spend thousands of dollars investigating these false claims. Furthermore, insanity is in full bloom, and used as an excuse to 1) hate everyone, 2) justify their own mistakes (for example, a CNN reporter asked the leader of the NAACP if she was black due to a scandal which people were claiming she wasn't. In which she responded that she was not black, but identified as such), and 3) causes hatred for everyone.

File:Out of 40 women only 2 were female.jpeg

An example of political correct nonsense resulting from Doublethinking

The insanity of the political correct state ranges from being "triggered" from calling a transgender who calls herself "her" a he, to being completly offended by the fact that the commonly used abbreviation for Code of Conduct is "CoC", which looks roughly like the word Cock. This video does a good job of summing up the Political Correctness we needed to endure in 2015.

File:Ideas.png

How ideas are critiqued, for dummies

To pretty much all SJWs, any comment against something they believe in is a form of patriarchal rape.

People such as Zoe Quinn and Anita Scarcasian I am against even more. They found a way to manipulate the already-bias media into believing that they are important, that they are fighters of feminist rights, and that they are programmers.

The Freedom of Speech issue

File:Free Speech in Trouble.png

With Political Correctness, you have fewer rights and more censorship

Political Correctness also violates the Freedom of Speech of every citizen, and reserving it to those that know their esoteric made-up rules on how not to bully.

Feminism in tech

Feminism has no place in technological affairs. The wage gap, while it has the possibility of being real, is not as important as everyone claims it to be. Furthermore, a lot of the so-called "Fighters for Equality" that claim they get paid less than the male programmers in their fields, when in reality they are web developers that can't even make a presentable website. Therefore, they are obviously either being paid their worth, or being paid above their worth because of the PC-state they are making, forcing their employers to pay them just because they are women.

Wikipedia

I've stopped using Wikipedia because they turned into a Safe Space.

Proof

more proof

even more proof

some follow-up to the previous link

Gibberish

Slashdot article about it

Archive of Previous

Research paper linked in previous links (pdf)

Here is an article I wrote about it.

Wikipedia is a safe space, and also begs for money despite having over ~15 mil USD in reserve. Please boycott it

Github

Github is a software repo that is contrary to their intended purpose and instead fight mysogany and trans-phobia; a completely irrelevant thing to do when having business in computer technology.

Github SJWness

Convo with InstallGen2 and others

posting the incredibly stupid news to a political chat

Stallman-esque article against Github

An example of the kind of community Github attracts

Use this instead of my old github

Open Source

I am a FSFag, and I believe in the power of GNU and Richard Mathew Stallman. Due to this, I have some strong beliefs against Open Source.

• Open Source misses the point (as seen here)

• Open Source uses weak, flimsy licenses that don't guarantee it is Freedom-Friendly(tm)

• The Open Source Initiative believes simply that source-published software will result in a better product. This is completely contradictory to what GNU believes in, which is that Computers have become an everyday part of society and life itself. Therefore, its use, how it is used, and how the user is allowed to use them is a social-political issue, and they show how they stand. I believe in the former only in part, and the latter in full.

Now, just as RMS has said, Open Source is Free-Software in practice, not principle. Very rarely will you see an Open Source program that is not FSF-compatible. That being said, I will not be a part of the Open Source community, share its ideals, nor will I endorse the BSD, MIT, and other Open Source licenses. Will I use software licensed under these licenses? On occasion, yes. Would I put anything under these licenses? Absolutely not.

External links

Computer Website (dead link, being replaced soon)

Furry/Nostalgia Site

Made this style guide, but it is not in use yet

GNU Social (more on GNU Social here)

Git